Stuff I've been reading (April 2020)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in April 2020:

Books

  • Balfour, Danny L., and Guy B. Adams. Unmasking administrative evil. Routledge, 2014.
  • Bauer, Heike. The Hirschfeld Archives: violence, death, and modern queer culture. Temple University Press, 2017.
  • Davy, Zowie. Recognizing transsexuals: Personal, political and medicolegal embodiment. Routledge, 2016.
  • Downing, Lisa, ed. After Foucault: Culture, Theory, and Criticism in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • Harding, Sandra. Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press, 2008.
  • Holstein, James A. and Gubrium, Jaber F. The Self we Live By: Narrative Identities in a Postmodern World. Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Hird, Myra J. Sex, gender, and science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
  • Jordan-Young, Rebecca M. Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Harvard University Press, 2011.
  • Markell, Patchen. Bound by recognition. Princeton University Press, 2009.
  • Nakamura, Lisa, and Peter Chow-White, eds. Race after the Internet. Routledge, 2013.
  • Oudshoorn, Nelly. Beyond the natural body: An archaeology of sex hormones. Routledge, 2003.
  • Parry, Diana C., Corey W. Johnson, and Simone Fullagar, eds. Digital Dilemmas: Transforming Gender Identities and Power Relations in Everyday Life. Springer, 2018.
  • Rose, Nikolas, and Joelle M. Abi-Rached. Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton University Press, 2013.
  • Rudacille, Deborah. The riddle of gender: Science, activism, and transgender rights. Anchor, 2006.
  • Sayegh, Alexandre Gajevic. Justice in a Non-Ideal World: Bridging the Gap Between Political Theory and Real-World Politics. Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019.
  • Subrahmanian, Eswaran, Yoram Reich, and Sruthi Krishnan. We are not users: dialogues, diversity, and design. MIT Press, 2020.
  • Van der Ploeg, Irma, and Jason Pridmore, eds. Digitizing Identities: Doing Identity in a Networked World. Routledge, 2015.
  • Veltman, Andrea, and Mark Piper, eds. Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Papers and Chapters

  • Amrute, Sareeta. “Bored Techies Being Casually Racist: Race as Algorithm.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243920912824.
  • Bear, Laura. “Time as technique.” Annual Review of Anthropology 45 (2016): 487-502.
  • Benezra, Amber. “Race in the Microbiome.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243920911998.
  • Cambre, Julia, and Chinmay Kulkarni. “One Voice Fits All? Social Implications and Research Challenges of Designing Voices for Smart Devices.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3.CSCW (2019): 1-19.
  • Cascio, M. Ariel. “Rigid therapies, rigid minds: Italian professionals’ perspectives on autism interventions.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 39.2 (2015): 235-253.
  • Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. “Remaking participation in science and democracy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2019): 0162243919850885.
  • Connell, RW. “A very straight gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, and the dynamics of gender.” American sociological review (1992): 735-751.
  • O’Connor, Cliodhna, and Helene Joffe. “How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence.” Public understanding of science 22.3 (2013): 254-268.
  • Cooper, Davina. “A very binary drama: The conceptual struggle for gender’s future.” feminists@law 9.1 (2019).
  • Davenport, Lauren. “The Fluidity of Racial Classifications.” Annual Review of Political Science 23 (2020).
  • Fein, Elizabeth. “Innocent machines: Asperger’s syndrome and the neurostructural self.” Sociological reflections on the neurosciences 13 (2011): 27-49.
  • Freeman, Guo, et al. “Simulating marriage: Gender roles and emerging intimacy in an online game.” Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 2015.
  • Froese, Anna, and Natalie Mevissen. “Failure through Success: Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2019): 0162243919864711.
  • Frost, Samantha. “Re-considering the turn to biology in feminist theory.” Feminist Theory 15.3 (2014): 307-326.
  • Garry, Ann. “Intersectionality, metaphors, and the multiplicity of gender.” Hypatia 26.4 (2011): 826-850.
  • Gekker, Alex, and Sam Hind. “Infrastructural surveillance.” New Media & Society (2019): 1461444819879426.
  • Grinker, Roy Richard. “Reframing the science and anthropology of autism.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 39.2 (2015): 345-350.
  • Grzanka, Patrick R. “Queer survey research and the ontological dimensions of heterosexism.” WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly 44.3 (2016): 131-149.
  • Hansen, Helena, Caroline Parker, and Jules Netherland. “Race as a Ghost Variable in (White) Opioid Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243920912812.
  • Herman, Elis L. “Tranarchism: transgender embodiment and destabilization of the state.” Contemporary Justice Review 18.1 (2015): 76-92.
  • Hilário, Ana Patrícia. “Rethinking trans identities within the medical and psychological community: a path towards the depathologization and self-definition of gender identification in Portugal?.” Journal of Gender Studies 29.3 (2020): 245-256.
  • Joel, Daphna, et al. “Queering gender: studying gender identity in ‘normative’individuals.” Psychology & Sexuality 5.4 (2014): 291-321.
  • Johnson, Austin H. “Beyond inclusion: Thinking toward a transfeminist methodology.” in At the center: Feminism, social science and knowledge. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015.
  • Jones, Lucy. “‘The fact they knew before I did upset me most’: Essentialism and normativity in lesbian and gay youths’ coming out stories.” Sexualities (2019): 1363460719830343.
  • Klysing, Amanda. “Exposure to Scientific Explanations for Gender Differences Influences Individuals’ Personal Theories of Gender and Their Evaluations of a Discriminatory Situation.” Sex Roles 82.5-6 (2020): 253-265.
  • Law, John. “On power and its tactics: a view from the sociology of science.” The Sociological Review 34.1 (1986): 1-38.
  • Law, John. “Power, discretion and strategy.” The Sociological Review 38.1_suppl (1990): 165-191.
  • Lehavot, Keren, Kevin M. King, and Jane M. Simoni. “Development and validation of a gender expression measure among sexual minority women.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 35.3 (2011): 381-400.
  • Levitt, Heidi M. “A psychosocial genealogy of LGBTQ+ gender: An empirically based theory of gender and gender identity cultures.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43.3 (2019): 275-297.
  • Lockhart, Jeffrey W. 2020. “‘A Large and Long Standing Body’: Historical Authority in the Science of Sex.” In Far Right Revisionism and the End of History: Alt/Histories, edited by Louie Dean Valencia-García, 359–86. New York: Routledge
  • Lorenzini, Daniele. “On possibilising genealogy.” Inquiry (2020): 1-22.
  • Lugones, María. “Gender and Universality in Colonial Methodology.” Critical Philosophy of Race 8.1-2 (2020): 25-47.
  • Malatino, Hilary. “Tough Breaks: Trans Rage and the Cultivation of Resilience.” Hypatia 34.1 (2019): 121-140.
  • Medina, José. “Identity trouble: Disidentification and the problem of difference.” Philosophy & social criticism 29.6 (2003): 655-680.
  • Molden, Berthold. “Resistant pasts versus mnemonic hegemony: On the power relations of collective memory.” Memory Studies 9.2 (2016): 125-142.
  • Moradi, Bonnie. “Naming gender as axis of power and coalition politics.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43.3 (2019): 303-308.
  • Moser, Ingunn. “Sociotechnical practices and difference: On the interferences between disability, gender, and class.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31.5 (2006): 537-564.
  • Munyikwa, Michelle. “(De) Racializing Refugee Medicine.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243920905014.
  • Nuru, Audra K. “Between layers: Understanding the communicative negotiation of conflicting identities by transgender individuals.” Communication Studies 65.3 (2014): 281-297.
  • Patil, Vrushali. “The heterosexual matrix as imperial effect.” Sociological Theory 36.1 (2018): 1-26.
  • Polack, Peter. “Beyond algorithmic reformism: Forward engineering the designs of algorithmic systems.” Big Data & Society 7.1 (2020): 2053951720913064.
  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. “Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations.” Gender & society 18.4 (2004): 510-531.
  • Risman, Barbara J. “Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism.” Gender & society 18.4 (2004): 429-450.
  • Risman, Barbara J. “The (mis) acquisition of gender identity among transsexuals.” Qualitative Sociology 5.4 (1982): 312-325.
  • Ritchie, Marnie. “Fusing Race: The Phobogenics of Racializing Surveillance.” Surveillance & Society 18.1 (2020): 12-29.
  • Schnabel, Landon, and Lindsey Breitwieser. “Recent Advances in Feminist Science and Technology Studies: Reconceptualizing Subjectivity and Knowledge”. In At the center: Feminism, social science and knowledge. 20 (2015): 43-63.
  • Southerton, Clare, et al. “Restricted modes: Social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship.” New Media & Society (2020): 1461444820904362.
  • Tee, Nicola, and Peter Hegarty. “Predicting opposition to the civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16.1 (2006): 70-80.
  • Valentine, David. “Sue E. Generous: Toward a theory of non-transexuality.” Feminist Studies 38.1 (2012): 185-211.
  • Valentine, David. “‘The calculus of pain’: Violence, anthropological ethics, and the category transgender.” Ethnos 68.1 (2003): 27-48.
  • Vidal-Ortiz, Salvador. “The figure of the transwoman of color through the lens of “doing gender”.” Gender & Society 23.1 (2009): 99-103.
  • de Vries, Kylan Mattias. “Transgender people of color at the center: Conceptualizing a new intersectional model.” Ethnicities 15.1 (2015): 3-27.
  • Ziegler, Erin, et al. “Models of Care and Team Activities in the Delivery of Transgender Primary Care: An Ontario Case Study.” Transgender Health (2020).