Stuff I've been reading (April 2021)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in April 2021:

Books

  • Ahmed, Sara. Living a feminist life. Duke University Press, 2016.
  • Benfield, Dalida Maria, Bruno Moreschi, Gabriel Pereira, Katheine Ye, eds. Affecting Technologies, Machining Intelligences. CAD+SR, 2021.
  • Bratich, Jack Z., Jeremy Packer, and Cameron McCarthy, eds. Foucault, cultural studies, and governmentality. SUNY Press, 2003.
  • Connolly, William E. The ethos of pluralization. University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
  • Connolly, William E. Identity, difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox. University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
  • Crawford, Kate. The Atlas of AI. Yale University Press, 2021.
  • Datta, Anindita, et al., eds. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Feminist Geographies. Routledge, 2020.
  • Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press, 2018.
  • Happe, Kelly E., Jenell Johnson, and Marina Levina, eds. Biocitizenship: The Politics of Bodies, Governance, and Power. Vol. 19. NYU Press, 2018.
  • Hess, David J. Undone science: Social movements, mobilized publics, and industrial transitions. MIT Press, 2016.
  • Longino, Helen E. The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press, 2002.
  • Longino, Helen E. Studying human behavior: How scientists investigate aggression and sexuality. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
  • MacKenzie, Gordene Olga. Transgender nation. Popular Press, 1994.
  • Malatino, Hil. Queer embodiment: Monstrosity, medical violence, and intersex experience. University of Nebraska Press, 2019.
  • Nagar, Richa. Hungry Translations: Relearning the World Through Radical Vulnerability. University of Illinois Press, 2019.
  • Weir, Allison. Sacrificial logics: Feminist theory and the critique of identity. Routledge, 1996.
  • Van Bouwel, Jeroen, ed. The social sciences and democracy. Springer, 2009.
  • van den Wijngaard, Marianne. Reinventing the sexes: The biomedical construction of femininity and masculinity. Indiana University Press, 1997.
  • Vitale, Anne M. The Gendered Self Further Commentary on the Transsexual Phenomenon, 2010.
  • Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun. Situated intervention: Sociological experiments in health care. MIT Press, 2015.

Papers and Chapters

  • Adam, Alison. “Deleting the subject: A feminist reading of epistemology in artificial intelligence.” Minds and Machines 10.2 (2000): 231-253.
  • Adam, Alison, and Helen Richardson. “Feminist philosophy and information systems.” Information Systems Frontiers 3.2 (2001): 143-154.
  • Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, and Valerie Walkerdine. “Foucauldian discourse analysis.” In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2008): 91-108.
  • Basco-Carrera, Laura, et al. “Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management.” Environmental Modelling & Software 91 (2017): 95-110.
  • Berenstain, Nora, et al. “Epistemic oppression, resistance, and resurgence.” Contemporary Political Theory (2021): 1-32.
  • Bernstein, Mary. “The contradictions of gay ethnicity: Forging identity in Vermont.” In Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state (2002): 85-104.
  • Blacker, Sarah. “Strategic translation: pollution, data, and Indigenous Traditional Knowledge.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (2021).
  • Boland, Tom. “Critique is a thing of this world: Towards a genealogy of critique.” History of the Human Sciences 27.1 (2014): 108-123.
  • Bratich, Jack. “Civil society must be defended: Misinformation, moral panics, and wars of restoration.” Communication, Culture, and Critique 13.3 (2020): 311-332.
  • Broad, Kendal L. “GLB+ T?: Gender/sexuality movements and transgender collective identity (de) constructions.” International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 7.4 (2002): 241-264.
  • Brunner, Elizabeth, and Sarah Partlow-Lefevre. “# MeToo as networked collective: examining consciousness-raising on wild public networks.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 17.2 (2020): 166-182.
  • Bucher, Taina. “Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning.” Media, Culture & Society 42.4 (2020): 610-617.
  • Burrow, Sylvia. “The political structure of emotion: From dismissal to dialogue.” Hypatia 20.4 (2005): 27-43.
  • Cahill, Caitlin. “Participatory data analysis.” In Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (2007): 181-187.
  • Cisneros, Natalie. ““Alien” sexuality: Race, maternity, and citizenship.” Hypatia 28.2 (2013): 290-306.
  • Cisneros, Natalie. “Embodied genealogies: Anzaldúa, Nietzsche, and diverse epistemic practice.” In Theories of the Flesh. Oxford University Press, 2020. 188-203.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. “Piecing Together a Genealogical Puzzle. Intersectionality and American Pragmatism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3.III-2 (2011).
  • Cornell, Drucilla. “Las Greñudas: Recollections on consciousness-raising.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25.4 (2000): 1033-1039.
  • Cox Hall, Amy. “Archival labyrinth: words, things and bodies in epistemic formation.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1.1 (2018): 170-185.
  • Dotson, Kristie, and Ezgi Sertler. “When Freeing Your Mind Isn’t Enough.” Applied Epistemology (2021): 19.
  • Douglas‐Jones, Rachel. “Bodies of data: doubles, composites, and aggregates.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (2021).
  • Engeström, Yrjö, et al. “Toward a grammar of collaboration.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 22.2 (2015): 92-111.
  • Erickson, Ingrid, and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. “Infrastructuring and the challenge of dynamic seams in mobile knowledge work.” Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer-Supported cooperative work & social computing. 2016.
  • Firth, Rhiannon, and Andrew Robinson. “For a revival of feminist consciousness-raising: horizontal transformation of epistemologies and transgression of neoliberal TimeSpace.” Gender and Education 28.3 (2016): 343-358.
  • Fischer, Clara. “Feminist philosophy, pragmatism, and the “turn to affect”: A genealogical critique.” Hypatia 31.4 (2016): 810-826.
  • Fortunato, Alexandro, et al. “Is It Autism? A Critical Commentary on the Co-Occurrence of Gender Dysphoria and Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Journal of Homosexuality (2021): 1-19.
  • Fourcade, Marion, and Fleur Johns. “Loops, ladders and links: the recursivity of social and machine learning.” Theory and Society 49.5 (2020): 803-832.
  • Frederiksen, Kirsten, Kirsten Lomborg, and Kirsten Beedholm. “Foucault’s notion of problematization: A methodological discussion of the application of Foucault’s later work to nursing research.” Nursing Inquiry 22.3 (2015): 202-209.
  • Freese, Jeremy, and David Peterson. “The emergence of statistical objectivity: changing ideas of epistemic vice and virtue in science.” Sociological theory 36.3 (2018): 289-313.
  • Graham, Linda J. “Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault.” The Australian Association of Research in Education Annual Conference. 2005.
  • Hales, Mike, and Joe Tidd. “The practice of routines and representations in design and development.” Industrial and Corporate Change 18.4 (2009): 551-574.
  • Hancox-Li, Leif, and I. Elizabeth Kumar. “Epistemic values in feature importance methods: Lessons from feminist epistemology.” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2021.
  • Hare, Matt, Rebecca A. Letcher, and Anthony J. Jakeman. “Participatory modelling in natural resource management: a comparison of four case studies.” Integrated Assessment 4.2 (2003): 62-72.
  • Heemsbergen, Luke, and Adam Molnar. “VPNs as boundary objects of the internet:(Mis) trust in the translation (s).” Internet Policy Review 9.4 (2020): 1-19.
  • Heller, Kevin Jon. “Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault.” SubStance 25.1 (1996): 78-110.
  • Houston, Lara, et al. “Values in repair.” Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2016.
  • De Eguia Huerta, Maria. “Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations.” Social Epistemology 34.4 (2020): 370-381.
  • Huvila, Isto. “Putting to (information) work: A Stengersian perspective on how information technologies and people influence information practices.” The Information Society 34.4 (2018): 229-243.
  • Invernizzi, Noela. “Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3.1 (2020): 227-253.
  • Joynt, Chase, and Kristen Schilt. “Anxiety at the Archive.” Transgender Studies Quarterly 2.4 (2015): 635-644.
  • Joynt, Chase, and Emmett Harsin Drager. “Condition Verified: On Photography, Trans Visibility, and Legacies of the Clinic.” Arts. Vol. 8. No. 4, 2019.
  • Kara, Helen. “Identity and power in co-produced activist research.” Qualitative Research 17.3 (2017): 289-301.
  • Kawall, Jason. “Other–regarding epistemic virtues.” Ratio 15.3 (2002): 257-275.
  • Kelty, Christopher, et al. “Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66.3 (2015): 474-488.
  • Køster, Allan. “Personal history, beyond narrative: An embodied perspective.” Journal of phenomenological Psychology 48.2 (2017): 163-187.
  • Kidd, Ian James. “Epistemic corruption and education.” Episteme 16.2 (2019): 220-235.
  • Kindon, Sara, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. “Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods.” In Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place, Routledge, 2007. 9-18.
  • Kong, Sui-Ting, Petula Sik-Ying Ho, and Stevi Jackson. “Doing being observed: Experimenting with collaborative focus group analysis in post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong.” Sociological Research Online (2020): 1360780420961400.
  • Koopman, Colin. “Two uses of Michel Foucault in political theory: Concepts and methods in Giorgio Agamben and Ian Hacking.” (2015).
  • Lake, Danielle. “Emergent, Relational Revolution: What More Do We Have to Learn from Jane Addams?.” Hypatia (2021): 1-15.
  • Law, John, and Wen‐yuan Lin. “Cultivating disconcertment 1.” The Sociological Review 58 (2010): 135-153.
  • Law, John, et al. “Modes of syncretism: Notes on noncoherence.” Common knowledge 20.1 (2014): 172-192.
  • Law, John, and Wen-yuan Lin. “Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, symmetry, and method.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 11.2 (2017): 211-227.
  • Law, John, and Solveig Joks. “Indigeneity, science, and difference: Notes on the politics of how.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44.3 (2019): 424-447.
  • Law, John, and Wen-yuan Lin. “Care-ful Research: Sensibilitires from STS.” Heterogenities (2020).
  • Leeuw, Sarah de, Emilie S. Cameron, and Margo L. Greenwood. “Participatory and community‐based research, Indigenous geographies, and the spaces of friendship: A critical engagement.” The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 56.2 (2012): 180-194.
  • Leo, Brooklyn. “The Colonial/Modern [Cis] Gender System and Trans World Traveling.” Hypatia 35.3 (2020): 454-474.
  • Light, Ann. “Design and social innovation at the margins: finding and making cultures of plurality.” Design and Culture 11.1 (2019): 13-35.
  • Liveriero, Federica. “The Social Bases of Self-Respect. Political Equality and Epistemic Injustice.” Phenomenology and Mind 16 (2019): 90-101.
  • Lugones, Maria C., and Elizabeth V. Spelman. “Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for ‘the woman’s voice’.” Women’s Studies International Forum. Vol. 6. No. 6. Pergamon, 1983.
  • MacLure, Maggie. “The wonder of data.” Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies 13.4 (2013): 228-232.
  • Martino, Wayne, and Kenan Omercajic. “A trans pedagogy of refusal: interrogating cisgenderism, the limits of antinormativity and trans necropolitics.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society (2021): 1-16.
  • Medina, José. “Racial violence, emotional friction, and epistemic activism.” Angelaki 24.4 (2019): 22-37.
  • Melville-Richards, Lucy, et al. “Making authentic: exploring boundary objects and bricolage in knowledge mobilisation through National Health Service-university partnerships.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice (2020).
  • Monteiro, Marko. “Ethnography and interdisciplinary work: experiences from the US and Brazil.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1.1 (2018): 153-169.
  • Moten, Fred, and Stefano Harney. “The university and the undercommons: Seven theses.” Social Text 22.2 (2004): 101-115.
  • Nagar, Richa, and Roozbeh Shirazi. “Radical vulnerability.” Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50 (2019): 236-242.
  • Narayan, Uma. “Working together across difference: Some considerations on emotions and political practice.” Hypatia 3.2 (1988): 31-48.
  • Pedwell, Carolyn. “Affective (self-) transformations: Empathy, neoliberalism and international development.” Feminist theory 13.2 (2012): 163-179.
  • Pols, Jeannette. “Knowing patients: turning patient knowledge into science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39.1 (2014): 73-97.
  • Pournaras, Evangelos. “Collective Learning: A 10-Year Odyssey to Human-centered Distributed Intelligence.” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems (ACSOS). IEEE, 2020.
  • Rappaport, Joanne. “Beyond participant observation: Collaborative ethnography as theoretical innovation.” Collaborative anthropologies 1.1 (2008): 1-31.
  • Reason, Peter. “Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty.” Action Research 1.1 (2003): 103-123.
  • Reger, Jo. “More than one feminism: Organizational structure and the construction of collective identity.” In Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state (2002): 171-184.
  • Reger, Jo. “Organizational “emotion work” through consciousness-raising: An analysis of a feminist organization.” Qualitative Sociology 27.2 (2004): 205-222.
  • Rosenthal, Naomi Braun. “Consciousness Raising: From Revolution to Re‐Evaluation.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 8.4 (1984): 309-326.
  • Rosner, Daniela K., and Morgan Ames. “Designing for repair? Infrastructures and materialities of breakdown.” Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 2014.
  • Routledge, Paul. “Acting in the network: ANT and the politics of generating associations.” Environment and planning D: Society and space 26.2 (2008): 199-217.
  • Routledge, Paul, and Kate Driscoll Derickson. “Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33.3 (2015): 391-407.
  • Ruiz-Trejo, Marisa G., and Dau García-Dauder. “Epistemic-corporeal workshops: putting strong reflexivity into practice.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 2.1 (2019): 42-58.
  • Ruth, Sheila. “A serious look at consciousness-raising.” Social Theory and Practice 2.3 (1973): 289-300.
  • Sholler, Dan. “Infrastructuring as an Occasion for Resistance: Organized Resistance to Policy-Driven Information Infrastructure Development in the US Healthcare Industry.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29.4 (2020): 451-496.
  • Srivastava, Sarita. ““You’re calling me a racist?” The Moral and Emotional Regulation of Antiracism and Feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 31.1 (2005): 29-62.
  • Srivastava, Sarita. “Tears, fears and careers: Anti-racism and emotion in social movement organizations.” Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (2006): 55-90.
  • Srivastava, Sarita, and Margot Francis. “The problem of authentic experience’: Storytelling in anti-racist and anti-homophobic education.” Critical Sociology 32.2-3 (2006): 275-307.
  • Su, Norman Makoto, Amanda Lazar, and Lilly Irani. “Critical Affects: Tech Work Emotions Amidst the Techlash.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5.CSCW1 (2021): 1-27.
  • Thompson, Ed. “An actor-network theory of boundary objects: construction and disappearance.” British Academy of Management, 2016.
  • Tuana, Nancy. “The speculum of ignorance: The women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance.” Hypatia 21.3 (2006): 1-19.
  • Venegas, Mario. “Between community and sectarianism: calling out and negotiated discipline in prefigurative politics.” Social Movement Studies (2021): 1-18.
  • de Vries, Katja. “You never fake alone. Creative AI in action.” Information, Communication & Society 23.14 (2020): 2110-2127.
  • Whittier, Nancy. “Identity politics, consciousness-raising, and visibility politics.” In The Oxford handbook of US women’s social movement activism (2017): 376-397.
  • Wright, James. “Suspect AI: Vibraimage, Emotion Recognition Technology, and Algorithmic Opacity.” Science, Technology & Society (2021).
  • Zachry, Mark. “An interview with Susan Leigh Star.” Technical Communication Quarterly 17.4 (2008): 435-454.