Stuff I've been reading (February 2020)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in February 2020:

Books

  • Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/la frontera. Vol. 3. San Francisco: aunt lute books, 1987.
  • Atanasoski, Neda, and Kalindi Vora. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Duke University Press, 2019.
  • Behrensen, Maren. The State and the Self: Identity and Identities. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
  • Brookey, Robert Alan. Reinventing the male homosexual: The rhetoric and power of the gay gene. Indiana University Press, 2002.
  • Brown, Wendy. In the ruins of neoliberalism: the rise of antidemocratic politics in the west. Columbia University Press, 2019.
  • Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing grounded theory. Sage, 2014.
  • Compton, D’Lane, Tey Meadow, and Kristen Schilt, eds. Other, please specify: Queer methods in sociology. University of California Press, 2018.
  • DiSalvo, Carl. Revealing Hegemony: Agonistic Information Design. MIT Press, 2012.
  • Downing, Lisa, Iain Morland, and Nikki Sullivan. Fuckology: critical essays on John Money’s diagnostic concepts. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
  • Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, 2011.
  • Finlayson, Lorna. The political is political: Conformity and the illusion of dissent in contemporary political philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
  • Franks, Benjamin. Anarchisms, Postanarchisms and Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019.
  • Fraser, Nancy. The old is dying and the new cannot be born: From progressive neoliberalism to Trump and beyond. Verso Books, 2019.
  • Hammersley, Martyn and Atkinson, Paul. Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge, 2007.
  • Haraway, Donna J. Manifestly Haraway. Vol. 37. U of Minnesota Press, 2016.
  • Hayward, Clarissa Rile. De-facing power. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Lawler, Steph. Identity: sociological perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  • Oberlander, Jonathan, et al., eds. The Social Medicine Reader, Volume I: Ethics and Cultures of Biomedicine. Duke University Press, 2019.
  • Purcell, Mark. The down-deep delight of democracy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • Shantz, Jeffrey, and Dana M. Williams. Anarchy and society: Reflections on anarchist sociology. Brill, 2013.
  • Shotwell, Alexis. Against purity: Living ethically in compromised times. U of Minnesota Press, 2016.
  • Sloop, John M. Disciplining gender: Rhetorics of sex identity in contemporary US culture. University of Massachusetts Press, 2004.
  • Stone, Allucquère Rosanne. The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. MIT press, 1996.
  • Vidal, Fernando, and Francisco Ortega. Being brains: making the cerebral subject. Fordham University Press, 2017.
  • Wang, Jackie. Carceral capitalism. Vol. 21. Semiotext(e), 2018.

Papers and Chapters

  • Ancell, Aaron. “The fact of unreasonable pluralism.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5.4 (2019): 410-428.
  • Anderson, Elizabeth. “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman’s” Challenging Liberalism”.” Hypatia 24.4 (2009): 130-145.
  • Applebaum, Barbara. “Social justice education, moral agency, and the subject of resistance.” Educational theory 54.1 (2004): 59-72.
  • Baier, Annette. “Trust and antitrust.” Ethics 96.2 (1986): 231-260.
  • Bailey, Moya. “# transform (ing) DH Writing and Research: An Autoethnography of Digital Humanities and Feminist Ethics.” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 9.2 (2015).
  • Bietti, Elettra. “From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy.” Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020.
  • Bohman, James. “Public reason and cultural pluralism: Political liberalism and the problem of moral conflict.” Political theory 23.2 (1995): 253-279.
  • Boyd, Danah. “Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us.” Research Ethics 12.1 (2016): 4-13.
  • Cahill, Ann J. “The Difference Sameness Makes: Objectification, Sex Work, and Queerness.” Hypatia 29.4 (2014): 840-856.
  • Calhoun, Cheshire. “Changing one’s heart.” Ethics 103.1 (1992): 76-96.
  • Calo, Ryan. “Consumer subject review boards: A thought experiment.” Stan. L. Rev. Online 66 (2013): 97.
  • Calude, Cristian S., and Giuseppe Longo. “The deluge of spurious correlations in big data.” Foundations of science 22.3 (2017): 595-612.
  • Casper, Christian F. “In praise of carbon, in praise of science: The epideictic rhetoric of the 1996 Nobel lectures in chemistry.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21.3 (2007): 303-323.
  • Catala, Amandine. “Democracy, trust, and epistemic justice.” The Monist 98.4 (2015): 424-440.
  • Chamak, Brigitte, and Béatrice Bonniau. “Changes in the diagnosis of autism: How parents and professionals act and react in France.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 37.3 (2013): 405-426.
  • Chan, Janet, and Lyria Bennett Moses. “Is big data challenging criminology?.” Theoretical criminology 20.1 (2016): 21-39.
  • Charmaz, Kathy. “The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry.” Qualitative inquiry 23.1 (2017): 34-45.
  • Christin, Angèle. “What data can do: A typology of mechanisms.” International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 20.
  • Cooky, Cheryl, Jasmine R. Linabary, and Danielle J. Corple. “Navigating Big Data dilemmas: Feminist holistic reflexivity in social media research.” Big Data & Society 5.2 (2018): 2053951718807731.
  • Cotter, Kelley, and Bianca C. Reisdorf. “Algorithmic Knowledge Gaps: A New Horizon of (Digital) Inequality.” International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 21.
  • Dieleman, Susan. “Epistemic justice and democratic legitimacy.” Hypatia 30.4 (2015): 794-810.
  • Dinerstein, Joel. “Technology and its discontents: On the verge of the posthuman.” American Quarterly 58.3 (2006): 569-595.
  • Diprose, Rosalyn. “Toward an ethico-politics of the posthuman: Foucault and Merleau-Ponty.” Parrhesia 8 (2009): 7-19.
  • Doan, Petra L. “To count or not to count: Queering measurement and the transgender community.” Women’s Studies Quarterly (2016): 89-110.
  • Downs, Stephen M., et al. “Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Network Open 2.12 (2019): e1917676-e1917676.
  • Duff, Koshka. “The Criminal Is Political: Policing Politics in Real Existing Liberalism.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3.4 (2017): 485-502.
  • Elish, Madeleine Clare, and Danah Boyd. “Situating methods in the magic of Big Data and AI.” Communication monographs 85.1 (2018): 57-80.
  • El-Haj, Nadia Abu. “The genetic reinscription of race.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (2007): 283-300.
  • Enoch, David. “Against public reason.” Oxford studies in political philosophy 1.20 (2015): 112-42.
  • Even Chorev, Nadav. “Data ambiguity and clinical decision making: A qualitative case study of the use of predictive information technologies in a personalized cancer clinical trial.” Health informatics journal 25.3 (2019): 500-510.
  • Gailey, Nerissa. “Strange Bedfellows: Anachronisms, Identity Politics, and the Queer Case of Trans.” Journal of homosexuality 64.12 (2017): 1713-1730.
  • Garvey, Jason C., et al. “Methodological troubles with gender and sex in higher education survey research.” The Review of Higher Education 43.1 (2019): 1-24.
  • Gertz, Nolen. “Autonomy online: Jacques Ellul and the Facebook emotional manipulation study.” Research Ethics 12.1 (2016): 55-61.
  • Gibbon, Sahra. “Translating population difference: the use and re-use of genetic ancestry in Brazilian cancer genetics.” Medical Anthropology 35.1 (2016): 58-72.
  • Glick, Jennifer L., et al. “For data’s sake: dilemmas in the measurement of gender minorities.” Culture, health & sexuality 20.12 (2018): 1362-1377.
  • Gotham, Katherine, et al. “The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity.” Journal of autism and developmental disorders 37.4 (2007): 613.
  • Govier, Trudy. “Self‐trust, autonomy, and self‐esteem.” Hypatia 8.1 (1993): 99-120.
  • Green, Ben, and Yiling Chen. “The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3.CSCW (2019): 1-24.
  • Green, Ben. “The False Promise of Risk Assessments: Epistemic Reform and the Limits of Fairness.” Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*’20). ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/3351095.3372869. 2020.
  • Greenawalt, Kent. “On public reason.” Chicago-Kent Law Review. 69 (1993): 669.
  • Halperin, David M. “The normalization of queer theory.” Journal of homosexuality 45.2-4 (2003): 339-343.
  • Haraldsson, Anna-Lena, and Mona Lilja. “Resistance against material artefacts: university spaces, administrative online systems and emotions.” Journal of Political Power 10.2 (2017): 166-183.
  • Hollin, Gregory. “Failing, hacking, passing: Autism, entanglement, and the ethics of transformation.” BioSocieties 12.4 (2017): 611-633.
  • Hollin, Gregory, and Alison Pilnick. “The categorisation of resistance: interpreting failure to follow a proposed line of action in the diagnosis of autism amongst young adults.” Sociology of health & illness 40.7 (2018): 1215-1232.
  • Hope, Simon. “Idealization, justice, and the form of practical reason.” Social Philosophy and Policy 33.1-2 (2016): 372-392.
  • Horton, John. “Rawls, public reason and the limits of liberal justification.” Contemporary political theory 2.1 (2003): 5-23.
  • Jack, Jordynn. “Chronotopes: Forms of time in rhetorical argument.” College English 69.1 (2006): 52-73.
  • Jackson Jr, John P. “Whatever happened to the cephalic index? The reality of race and the burden of proof.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40.5 (2010): 438-458.
  • Kellogg, Katherine C., Wanda J. Orlikowski, and JoAnne Yates. “Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations.” Organization science 17.1 (2006): 22-44.
  • Knight, Amber. “Disabling ideal theory.” Politics, Groups, and Identities (2018): 1-17.
  • Kushner, Kaysi Eastlick, and Raymond Morrow. “Grounded theory, feminist theory, critical theory: Toward theoretical triangulation.” Advances in Nursing Science 26.1 (2003): 30-43.
  • Labuski, Christine, and Colton Keo-Meier. “The (mis) measure of trans.” Transgender Studies Quarterly 2.1 (2015): 13-33.
  • Laitinen, Arto. “Sorting out aspects of personhood: Capacities, normativity and recognition.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14.5-6 (2007): 248-270.
  • Lester, Jessica Nina, and Trena M. Paulus. ““I’m Not Sure I Even Know”: Therapists’ Tentative Constructions of Autism.” Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal 11.3 (2015).
  • Lilja, Mona. “The politics of time and temporality in Foucault’s theorisation of resistance: ruptures, time-lags and decelerations.” Journal of Political Power 11.3 (2018): 419-432.
  • Lindqvist, Anna, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, and Emma A. Renström. “What is gender, anyway: a review of the options for operationalising gender.” Psychology & Sexuality (2020): 1-13.
  • O’Malley, Michael P., et al. “Asking queer (er) questions: epistemological and methodological implications for qualitative inquirers.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 31.7 (2018): 572-594.
  • M’charek, Amade, Victor Toom, and Lisette Jong. “The Trouble with Race in Forensic Identification.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243919899467.
  • Mang, Franz. “Public reason can be reasonably rejected.” Social Theory and Practice 43.2 (2017): 343-367.
  • Maynard, Douglas W., and Jason Turowetz. “Doing abstraction: Autism, diagnosis, and social theory.” Sociological theory 37.1 (2019): 89-116.
  • McGeer, Victoria. “Developing trust on the Internet.” Analyse & Kritik 26.1 (2004): 91-107.
  • McGuire, Jenifer K., et al. “The Genderqueer Identity (GQI) Scale: Measurement and validation of four distinct subscales with trans and LGBQ clinical and community samples in two countries.” International Journal of Transgenderism 20.2-3 (2019): 289-304.
  • McIntosh, Andrew M., et al. “Data science for mental health: a UK perspective on a global challenge.” The Lancet Psychiatry 3.10 (2016): 993-998.
  • Miller, Carolyn R. “Opportunity, opportunism, and progress: Kairos in the rhetoric of technology.” Argumentation 8.1 (1994): 81-96.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. “The limits of John Rawls’s pluralism.” Politics, philosophy & economics 4.2 (2005): 221-231.
  • Natale, Simone, and Andrea Ballatore. “Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence.” Convergence (2017): 1354856517715164.
  • Olson, Kathryn M. “Rethinking loci communes and Burkean transcendence: Rhetorical leadership while contesting change in the takeover struggle between AirTran and Midwest Airlines.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23.1 (2009): 28-60.
  • Orlikowski, Wanda J. “Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.” Organization science 13.3 (2002): 249-273.
  • Ortega, Francisco, and Suparna Choudhury. “‘Wired up differently’: Autism, adolescence and the politics of neurological identities.” Subjectivity 4.3 (2011): 323-345.
  • Palmié, Stephan. “Genomics, divination,“racecraft”.” American ethnologist 34.2 (2007): 205-222.
  • Raji, Inioluwa Deborah , Andrew Smart, Rebecca N. White, Margaret Mitchell, Timnit Gebru, Ben Hutchinson, Jamila Smith-Loud, Daniel Theron, and Parker Barnes. 2020. “Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing”. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
  • Rambukkana, Nathan. “The Politics of Gray Data: Digital Methods, Intimate Proximity, and Research Ethics for Work on the “Alt-Right”.” Qualitative Inquiry 25.3 (2019): 312-323.
  • Rieder, Gernot, and Judith Simon. “Datatrust: Or, the political quest for numerical evidence and the epistemologies of Big Data.” Big Data & Society 3.1 (2016): 2053951716649398.
  • Rieger, Kendra L. “Discriminating among grounded theory approaches.” Nursing inquiry 26.1 (2019): e12261.
  • Robeyns, Ingrid. “Ideal theory in theory and practice.” Social Theory and Practice 34.3 (2008): 341-362.
  • Rossi, Enzo. “Being realistic and demanding the impossible.” Constellations 26.4 (2019): 638-652.
  • Rüppel, Jonas. ““Now Is a Time for Optimism”: The Politics of Personalized Medicine in Mental Health Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44.4 (2019): 581-611.
  • Schmidt, Kjeld. “Of Maps and Scripts (1997).” Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices. Springer, London, 2008. 133-148.
  • Schwennesen, Nete. “Algorithmic assemblages of care: imaginaries, epistemologies and repair work.” Sociology of health & illness 41 (2019): 176-192.
  • Solomon, Martha. “The rhetoric of dehumanization: An analysis of medical reports of the Tuskegee syphilis project.” Western journal of speech communication 49.4 (1985): 233-247.
  • Steidl, Christina R., and Regina Werum. “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail: Operationalization matters.” Sociology Compass 13.8 (2019): e12727.
  • Thrasher, John, and Kevin Vallier. “The fragility of consensus: Public reason, diversity and stability.” European Journal of Philosophy 23.4 (2015): 933-954.
  • Tobiason, Glory. “Talking Our Way Around Expert Caution: A Rhetorical Analysis of VAM.” Educational Researcher 48.1 (2019): 19-30.
  • Turowetz, Jason, and Douglas W. Maynard. “Documenting diagnosis: testing, labelling, and the production of medical records in an autism clinic.” Sociology of health & illness 41.6 (2019): 1023-1039.
  • Vallier, Kevin. “Convergence and consensus in public reason.” Public Affairs Quarterly 25.4 (2011): 261-279.
  • Vallor, Shannon. “Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: Reflections on the ambiguous future of character.” Philosophy & Technology 28.1 (2015): 107-124.
  • Van Schoelandt, Chad. “Justification, coercion, and the place of public reason.” Philosophical Studies 172.4 (2015): 1031-1050.
  • Venkatasubramanian, Suresh, and Mark Alfano. “The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse.” (2020). In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Wang, Dakuo, et al. “Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists’ Perceptions of Automated AI.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3.CSCW (2019): 1-24.
  • Washington, Anne L., and Rachel Kuo. “Whose side are ethics codes on? power, responsibility and the social good.” Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020.
  • Westbrook, Laurel, and Aliya Saperstein. “New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys.” Gender & Society 29.4 (2015): 534-560.
  • Young, Meg, et al. “Beyond open vs. closed: Balancing individual privacy and public accountability in data sharing.” Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2019.
  • Zerilli, Linda MG. “Value pluralism and the problem of judgment: Farewell to public reason.” Political Theory 40.1 (2012): 6-31.
  • Zimmer, Michael. “Addressing conceptual gaps in big data research ethics: An application of contextual integrity.” Social Media+ Society 4.2 (2018): 2056305118768300.