Stuff I've been reading (July 2020)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in July 2020:

Books

  • Blackman, Lisa. Haunted data: Affect, transmedia, weird science. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
  • Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press, 1986.
  • Bruder, Johannes. Cognitive Code: Post-Anthropocentric Intelligence and the Infrastructural Brain. McGill-Queen’s Press, 2020.
  • Butler, Judith. Senses of the Subject. Fordham University Press, 2015.
  • Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press, 1991.
  • Hacking, Ian. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge university press, 1983.
  • Hammersley, Martyn. The radicalism of ethnomethodology: An assessment of sources and principles. Manchester University Press, 2018.
  • Hayward, Clarissa Rile. How Americans make race: Stories, institutions, spaces. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Hoy, David Couzens. Critical resistance: From poststructuralism to post-critique. MIT Press, 2005.
  • Hoy, David Couzens. The time of our lives: A critical history of temporality. MIT Press, 2012.
  • Koopman, Colin. Pragmatism as transition: Historicity and hope in James, Dewey, and Rorty. Columbia University Press, 2009.
  • Kruse, Corinna. The social life of forensic evidence. University of California Press, 2015.
  • Michael, Mike. Actor-network theory: Trials, trails and translations. Sage, 2016.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. The return of the political. Vol. 8. Verso, 2005.
  • Neyland, Daniel. The everyday life of an algorithm. Springer Nature, 2019.
  • Parker, Kelly A. and Heather E. Keith, eds. Pragmatist and American Philosophical Perspectives on Resilience. Lexington Books, 2019.
  • Pitcher, Erich N. Being and becoming professionally other: Identities, voices, and experiences of US trans academics*. Peter Lang Incorporated, 2018.
  • Plummer, Ken. Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. Routledge, 2002.
  • Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge, 2005.
  • Da Silva, Denise Ferreira. Toward a global idea of race. University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
  • Smith, Rogers M. Stories of peoplehood: The politics and morals of political membership. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Southgate, Beverley C. What is history for?. Psychology Press, 2005.
  • Star, Susan Leigh, ed. Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. Suny Press, 1995.
  • Taylor, Yvette, Sally Hines, and Mark Casey, eds. Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality. Springer, 2010.
  • Vartabedian, Julieta. Brazilian Travesti Migrations: Gender, Sexualities and Embodiment Experiences. Springer, 2018.
  • Vertesi, Janet, and David Ribes. DigitalSTS: A field guide for science & technology studies. Princeton University Press, 2019.
  • Weeks, Jeffrey. What is sexual history?. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  • Weick, Karl E. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, 1995.
  • Weir, Allison. Identities and freedom: Feminist theory between power and connection. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Willcocks, Leslie P., and John Mingers. Social theory and philosophy for information systems. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.
  • Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, 2011.

Papers and Chapters

  • Allen, Amy. “Rethinking power.” Hypatia 13.1 (1998): 21-40.
  • Andersen, Jack. “Understanding and interpreting algorithms: toward a hermeneutics of algorithms.” Media, Culture & Society (2020): 0163443720919373.
  • Asdal, Kristin. “What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16.1 (2015): 74-90.
  • Bailey, Diane E., and Stephen R. Barley. “Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies.” Information and Organization 30.2 (2020): 100286.
  • Beatty, Andrew. “How did it feel for you? Emotion, narrative, and the limits of ethnography.” American Anthropologist 112.3 (2010): 430-443.
  • Beer, David, and Roger Burrows. “Popular culture, digital archives and the new social life of data.” Theory, culture & society 30.4 (2013): 47-71.
  • Bliss, Catherine. “Translating racial genomics: passages in and beyond the lab.” Qualitative sociology 36.4 (2013): 423-443.
  • Bliss, Catherine. “Conceptualizing Race in the Genomic Age.” Hastings Center Report 50 (2020): S15-S22.
  • Bora, Alfons. “Technoscientific Normativity and the ‘‘Iron Cage’’of Law.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35.1 (2010): 3-28.
  • Bowker, Geof, and Bruno Latour. “A booming discipline short of discipline:(social) studies of science in France.” Social Studies of Science 17.4 (1987): 715-748.
  • Brundage, Miles, et al. “Toward trustworthy AI development: mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07213 (2020).
  • Busby, Helen, and Paul Martin. “Biobanks, national identity and imagined communities: The case of UK biobank.” Science as Culture 15.3 (2006): 237-251.
  • Bucher, Taina. “Neither black nor box: Ways of knowing algorithms.” Innovative methods in media and communication research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016. 81-98.
  • Carey, B. (2020), “The Language of Public Reason”. Journal of Social Philosophy. doi:10.1111/josp.12365
  • Chiumento, Anna, Atif Rahman, and Lucy Frith. “Writing to template: Researchers’ negotiation of procedural research ethics.” Social Science & Medicine (2020): 112980.
  • Cinnamon, Jonathan. “Attack the data: Agency, power, and technopolitics in South African data activism.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110.3 (2020): 623-639.
  • Clarke, Adele E., and Susan Leigh Star. “The social worlds framework: A theory/methods package.” The handbook of science and technology studies 3.0 (2008): 113-137.
  • Congdon, Matthew. ““Knower” as an ethical concept: From epistemic agency to mutual recognition.” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4.4 (2018).
  • Crawford, Kate. “Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41.1 (2016): 77-92.
  • Dawkins, Cedric. “Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25.1 (2015): 1-28.
  • Dickel, Sascha, et al. “Engineering Publics: The Different Modes of Civic Technoscience.” Science & Technology Studies (2019): 8-23.
  • Dourish, Paul, and Edgar Gómez Cruz. “Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data.” Big Data & Society 5.2 (2018): 2053951718784083.
  • Evans, Mark. “Public reason as liberal myth: impartialist liberalism, judicial review and the cult of the constitution.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 1.S1 (2003): 8-25.
  • Fossen, Thomas. “Agonistic critiques of liberalism: Perfection and emancipation.” Contemporary Political Theory 7.4 (2008): 376-394.
  • Gagnon, Elisa, and Anouk de Regt. “Rethinking How Humans and Machines Make Sense Together.” AMCIS2020 (2020).
  • Galdon Clavell, Gemma, et al. “Auditing Algorithms: On Lessons Learned and the Risks of Data Minimization.” Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 2020.
  • Geiger, R. Stuart, et al. “Garbage in, garbage out? do machine learning application papers in social computing report where human-labeled training data comes from?.” Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020.
  • Gerson, Elihu M., and Susan Leigh Star. “Analyzing due process in the workplace.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 4.3 (1986): 257-270.
  • Gerson, Elihu M. “Specialty boundaries, compound problems, and collaborative complexity.” Biological Theory 4.3 (2009): 247-252.
  • Gilmore, Sarah, and Kate Kenny. “Work-worlds colliding: Self-reflexivity, power and emotion in organizational ethnography.” human relations 68.1 (2015): 55-78.
  • Gray, Jonathan, et al. “Ways of seeing data: Toward a critical literacy for data visualizations as research objects and research devices.” Innovative methods in media and communication research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016. 227-251.
  • Grue, Jan. “Discourse analysis and disability: Some topics and issues.” Discourse & Society 22.5 (2011): 532-546.
  • Grünenberg, Kristina. “Wearing Someone Else’s Face: Biometric Technologies, Anti-spoofing and the Fear of the Unknown.” Ethnos (2019): 1-18.
  • Hänel, Hilkje C. “Hermeneutical Injustice,(Self-) Recognition, and Academia.” Hypatia (2020): 1-19.
  • Hong, Jacky FL, and Fiona KH O. “Conflicting identities and power between communities of practice: The case of IT outsourcing.” Management Learning 40.3 (2009): 311-326.
  • Huynh, Stephany, Adam McCrimmon, and Tom Strong. “The Change in Classification of Asperger Syndrome: An Exploration of Its Effects on Self-Identity.” The Qualitative Report 25.2 (2020): 379-397.
  • Introna, Lucas D. “Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible.” Ethics and Information Technology 9.1 (2007): 11-25.
  • Introna, Lucas D., and Niall Hayes. “On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters.” Information and Organization 21.2 (2011): 107-122.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila. “Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity.” In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (2015): 1-33.
  • Jones, Matthew. “Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic project: passions and participation.” Parallax 20.2 (2014): 14-30.
  • Kalyvas, Andreas. “Whose crisis? Which democracy? Notes on the current political conjuncture.” Constellations 26.3 (2019): 384-390.
  • Karkazis, K., & Jordan-Young, R. (2020). Sensing Race as a Ghost Variable in Science, Technology, and Medicine. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(5), 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920939306
  • Kaziunas, Elizabeth, et al. “Caring through data: Attending to the social and emotional experiences of health datafication.” Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2017.
  • Keegan, Cáel M. “Getting Disciplined: What’s Trans* About Queer Studies Now?.” Journal of homosexuality 67.3 (2020): 384-397.
  • Kenny, Kate. “Aesthetics and emotion in an organisational ethnography.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 2.4 (2008): 374-388.
  • Koopman, Colin, “Coding the Self: The Infopolitics and Biopolitics of Genetic Sciences”. In For “All of Us”?” On the Weight of Genomic Knowledge, ed. J. M. Reynolds and E. Parens, special report, Hastings Center Report 50, no. 3 (2020): S6– S14. DOI: 10.1002/hast.1150
  • Lash, Scott. “Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation?.” Theory, culture & society 24.3 (2007): 55-78.
  • Lee, Ashlin. “Towards Informatic Personhood: understanding contemporary subjects in a data-driven society.” Information, Communication & Society (2019): 1-16.
  • Lee, Ashlin J., and Peta S. Cook. “The myth of the “data‐driven” society: Exploring the interactions of data interfaces, circulations, and abstractions.” Sociology Compass 14.1 (2020): e12749.
  • Lobb, Andrea. ““Prediscursive Epistemic Injury”: Recognizing Another Form of Epistemic Injustice?.” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4.4 (2018).
  • Lutters, Wayne G., and Mark S. Ackerman. “Beyond boundary objects: collaborative reuse in aircraft technical support.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16.3 (2007): 341-372.
  • Lynch, Michael. “Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: Moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs.” Biology and Philosophy 6.2 (1991): 205-226.
  • Maclure, Jocelyn. “On the public use of practical reason: Loosening the grip of neo-Kantianism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32.1 (2006): 37-63.
  • Malatino, Hilary. “Pedagogies of becoming: Trans inclusivity and the crafting of being.” Transgender Studies Quarterly 2.3 (2015): 395-410.
  • Mark, Gloria, Kalle Lyytinen, and Mark Bergman. “Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8.11 (2007): 34.
  • Matthews, Malcolm. “Why Sheldon Cooper Can’t Be Black: The Visual Rhetoric of Autism and Ethnicity.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 13.1 (2019): 57-74.
  • May, Vivian M. ““Speaking into the void”? Intersectionality critiques and epistemic backlash.” Hypatia 29.1 (2014): 94-112.
  • Mcgonigle, Ian. “National Biobanking in Qatar and Israel: Tracing how Global Scientific Institutions Mediate Local Ethnic Identities.” Science, Technology and Society (2020): 0971721820931995.
  • McNeil, Maureen, et al. “Conceptualizing Imaginaries of Science, Technology, and Society.” In The handbook of science and technology studies (2016): 435.
  • Medina, José. 2018. “Misrecognition and Epistemic Injustice”. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6233.
  • Meilvang, Marie Leth. “The practice of jurisdictionalizing: How engineers use documents to shape and maintain professional authority.” The Sociological Review 68.1 (2020): 77-93.
  • Minarova-Banjac, Cindy. “Collective Memory and Forgetting: A Theoretical Discussion.” (2018).
  • van Nuenen, Tom, et al. “Transparency for whom? Assessing discriminatory AI.” Computer Magazine
  • Obar, Jonathan A. “Sunlight alone is not a disinfectant: Consent and the futility of opening Big Data black boxes (without assistance).” Big Data & Society 7.1 (2020): 2053951720935615.
  • Ottinger, Gwen. “Changing knowledge, local knowledge, and knowledge gaps: STS insights into procedural justice.” Science, technology, & human values 38.2 (2013): 250-270.
  • Peñalver, Eduardo M. “Is public reason counterproductive.” West Virginia Law Review. 110 (2007): 515.
  • Pigg, Stacy Leigh, Susan L. Erikson, and Kathleen Inglis. “Document/ation: Power, Interests, Accountabilities.” Anthropologica 60.1 (2018): 167-177.
  • Pritchard, Gareth. “Modelling Power in Anarchist Perspective.” Anarchist Studies 28.1 (2020): 9-32.
  • Raghavan, Manish, et al. “Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices.” Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020.
  • Rappert, Brian. “The distribution and resolution of the ambiguities of technology, or why Bobby can’t spray.” Social Studies of Science 31.4 (2001): 557-591.
  • Reardon, Jenny. “Why and How Bioethics Must Turn toward Justice: A Modest Proposal” Hastings Center Report 50 (2020).
  • Samuel, Chris. “Symbolic violence and collective identity: Pierre Bourdieu and the ethics of resistance.” Social Movement Studies 12.4 (2013): 397-413.
  • Schaap, Andrew. “Agonism in divided societies.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32.2 (2006): 255-277.
  • Schildt, Henri, Saku Mantere, and Joep Cornelissen. “Power in sensemaking processes.” Organization Studies 41.2 (2020): 241-265.
  • Schrögel, Philipp, and Alma Kolleck. “The Many Faces of Participation in Science.” Science & Technology Studies (2019): 77-99.
  • Seaver, Nick. “Knowing algorithms.” Digital STS (2019): 412-422.
  • Star, Susan Leigh. “Simplification in scientific work: An example from neuroscience research.” Social Studies of Science 13.2 (1983): 205-228.
  • Star, Susan Leigh. “Scientific work and uncertainty.” Social studies of Science 15.3 (1985): 391-427.
  • Star, Susan Leigh, and Elihu M. Gerson. “The management and dynamics of anomalies in scientific work.” Sociological Quarterly 28.2 (1987): 147-169.
  • Star, Susan Leigh. “The trojan door: Organizations, work, and the “open black Box”.” Systems practice 5.4 (1992): 395-410.
  • Star, Susan Leigh. “Listening for connections: Introduction to symposium on the work of Anselm Strauss.” Mind, Culture and Activity 2.4 (1995): 1-7.
  • Star, Susan Leigh. “Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems.” Cognition and communication at work (1998): 296.
  • Star, Susan Leigh, and Anselm Strauss. “Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work.” Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 8.1-2 (1999): 9-30.
  • Stirling, Andy. ““Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33.2 (2008): 262-294.
  • Thomas, K. Bailey. “Intersectionality and Epistemic Erasure: A Caution to Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia: 1-15.
  • Thomer, Andrea K., and Karen M. Wickett. “Relational data paradigms: What do we learn by taking the materiality of databases seriously?.” Big Data & Society 7.1 (2020): 2053951720934838.
  • Tubaro, Paola, Antonio A. Casilli, and Marion Coville. “The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence.” Big Data & Society 7.1 (2020): 2053951720919776.
  • Tutton, Richard. “Biobanks and the inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities.” Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts (2009): 75-95.
  • Vaughan, Diane. “The role of the organization in the production of techno-scientific knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 29.6 (1999): 913-943.
  • Vinck, Dominique. “Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices.” Engineering Studies 3.1 (2011): 25-44.
  • Walford, Antonia. “Raw data: Making relations matter.” Social Analysis 61.2 (2017): 65-80.
  • Wenman, Mark. “‘Agonistic pluralism’and three archetypal forms of politics.” Contemporary Political Theory 2.2 (2003): 165-186.
  • Wieringa, Maranke. “What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability.” Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020.
  • Wilkenfeld, Daniel A., and Allison M. McCarthy. “Ethical Concerns with Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum” Disorder”.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 30.1 (2020): 31-69.
  • Wodak, Ruth. “What CDA is about-a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2001).
  • Wolf, Christine T. “AI Models and Their Worlds: Investigating Data-Driven, AI/ML Ecosystems Through a Work Practices Lens.” International Conference on Information. Springer, Cham, 2020.
  • Wolf, Christine, and Drew Paine. “Sensemaking Practices in the Everyday Work of AI/ML Software Engineering. 2020” ICSEW 2020.
  • Wolf, Christine T. “Picking Apart the Black Box: Sociotechnical Contours of Accessibility in AI/ML Software Engineering.” International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, Cham, 2020.
  • Wolf, Christine T., and Kathryn E. Ringland. “Designing accessible, explainable AI (XAI) experiences.” ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 125 (2020): 1-1.
  • Wolf, Christine T. “Democratizing AI? experience and accessibility in the age of artificial intelligence.” XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 26.4 (2020): 12-15.
  • Wolgast, Elizabeth H. “The Demands of Public Reason” Columbia Law Review 94 (1994): 1936.
  • Young, Iris Marion. “Rawls’s political liberalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 3.2 (1995): 181-190.
  • Zaitsev, Anna, Uri Gal, and Barney Tan. “Coordination artifacts in Agile Software Development.” Information and Organization 30.2 (2020): 100288.
  • Zaitsev, Anna, Barney Tan, and Uri Gal. “Collaboration amidst volatility: The evolving nature of boundary objects in agile software development.” European Conference on Information Systems (2016).