Stuff I've been reading (July 2021)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in July 2021:

Books

  • Carey, Matthew. Mistrust: An ethnographic theory. Hau Books, 2017.
  • Fischer, Mia. Terrorizing gender: Transgender visibility and the surveillance practices of the US security state. University of Nebraska Press, 2019.
  • Gandy Jr, Oscar H. The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information. Oxford University Press, 2021.
  • Gould, Deborah B. Moving politics. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
  • Honig, Bonnie. Public things: Democracy in disrepair. Fordham University Press, 2017.
  • McCarthy, John, and Peter Wright. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, 2007.
  • Morrell, Michael E. Empathy and democracy: Feeling, thinking, and deliberation. Penn State Press, 2010.
  • Pitts, Andrea J., Mariana Ortega, and José Medina, eds. Theories of the flesh: Latinx and Latin American feminisms, transformation, and resistance. Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Rollins, Oliver. Conviction: The Making and Unmaking of the Violent Brain. Stanford University Press, 2021.
  • Rosa, Hartmut. The uncontrollability of the world. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
  • dos Santos, Monika, and Jean-François Pelletier, eds. The Social Constructions and Experiences of Madness. Brill, 2018.
  • Scheman, Naomi. Shifting ground: Knowledge and reality, transgression and trustworthiness. Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Scott, Susie. The social life of nothing: Silence, invisibility and emptiness in tales of lost experience. Routledge, 2019.
  • Shuster, Stef M. Trans Medicine: The Emergence and Practice of Treating Gender. NYU Press, 2021.
  • Sullivan, Shannon, and Nancy Tuana, eds. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Suny Press, 2007.
  • Sumerau, J. E., and Lain AB Mathers. America through transgender eyes. Rowman & Littlefield, 2019.
  • Verran, Helen. Science and an African logic. University of Chicago Press, 2001.
  • Wilson, Elizabeth A. Affect and artificial intelligence. University of Washington Press, 2011.

Papers and Chapters

  • Applebaum, Barbara. “Comforting discomfort as complicity: White fragility and the pursuit of invulnerability.” Hypatia 32.4 (2017): 862-875.
  • Asdal, Kristin, and Bård Hobæk. “The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber.” Social Studies of Science 50.2 (2020): 252-270.
  • Aytac, Ugur. “On the limits of the political: The problem of overly permissive pluralism in Mouffe’s agonism.” Constellations (2020).
  • Baughan, Amanda, et al. “Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Having Hard Conversations in Online Spaces.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5.CSCW1 (2021): 1-22.
  • Bellanova, Rocco, et al. “Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence.” International Political Sociology 15.1 (2021): 121-150.
  • Ben-Arie, Ronnen, and Tovi Fenster. “Politics of recognition in between antagonism and agonism: Exploring ‘mediated agonism’in Jaffa.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38.3 (2020): 405-422.
  • Blaser, Mario. “Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology.” Current anthropology 54.5 (2013): 547-568.
  • Bodker, Sussane. “Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development.” Human–computer interaction 11.3 (1996): 215-236.
  • Boler, Megan. “Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering worldviews.” In Discerning critical hope in educational practices. Routledge, 2013. 48-61.
  • Brown, Elspeth H. “Archival Activism, Symbolic Annihilation, and the LGBTQ2+ Community Archive.” Archivaria 89.1 (2020): 6-32.
  • Budarick, John. “Ethnic media and counterhegemony: Agonistic pluralism, policy, and professionalism.” International Journal of Communication 12 (2018): 15.
  • Celikates, Robin. “From critical social theory to a social theory of critique: on the critique of ideology after the pragmatic turn.” Constellations 13.1 (2006): 21-40.
  • Clarke, Adele E. “(Feminist) STS and Autobiography: Early Inspirations, Current Concerns.” Science as Culture 30.1 (2021): 26-43.
  • Cribb, Alan. “Managing ethical uncertainty: implicit normativity and the sociology of ethics.” Sociology of health & illness 42 (2020): 21-34.
  • Crooks, Roderic. “Between communication and violence.” Interactions 27.5 (2020): 60-63.
  • Crosby, Christina, and Janet R. Jakobsen. “Disability, Debility, and Caring Queerly.” Social Text 38.4 (2020): 77-103.
  • DePaula, Rogério. “Lost in translation: a critical analysis of actors, artifacts, agendas, and arenas in participatory design.” Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices-Volume 1. 2004.
  • Dhanorkar, Shipi, et al. “Who needs to know what, when?: Broadening the Explainable AI (XAI) Design Space by Looking at Explanations Across the AI Lifecycle.” Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 2021.
  • Dibben, Mark R. “Exploring the processual nature of trust and cooperation in organisations: A Whiteheadian analysis.” Philosophy of Management 4.1 (2004): 25-39.
  • Dotson, Kristie. “How is this paper philosophy?.” Comparative Philosophy 3.1 (2013): 121-121.
  • Edwards, Jason. “Play and democracy: Huizinga and the limits of agonism.” Political Theory 41.1 (2013): 90-115.
  • Fassin, Didier. “The politics of conspiracy theories: On AIDS in South Africa and a few other global plots.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 17 (2010): 39.
  • Flatscher, Matthias, and Sergej Seitz. “Latour, foucault, and post-truth: The role and function of critique in the era of the truth crisis.” Le foucaldien 6.1 (2020).
  • Fortunato, Alexandro, et al. “Is It Autism? A Critical Commentary on the Co-Occurrence of Gender Dysphoria and Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Journal of Homosexuality (2021): 1-19.
  • Freeman, Lauren and Heather Stewart. “The Problem of Recognition, Erasure and Epistemic Injustice in Medicine”. In Recognition Theory and Epistemic Injustice. 2021.
  • Gartner, Johannes, and Ina Wagner. “Mapping actors and agendas: Political frameworks of systems design and participation.” Human–Computer Interaction 11.3 (1996): 187-214.
  • Goi, Simona. “Agonism, deliberation, and the politics of abortion.” Polity 37.1 (2005): 54-81.
  • Gotfredsen, Katrine Bendtsen. “Enemies of the people: Theorizing dispossession and mirroring conspiracy in the Republic of Georgia.” Focaal 2016.74 (2016): 42-53.
  • Hall, Cheryl. “Recognizing the passion in deliberation: Toward a more democratic theory of deliberative democracy.” Hypatia 22.4 (2007): 81-95.
  • Harambam, Jaron, and Stef Aupers. “Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.” Public understanding of science 24.4 (2015): 466-480.
  • Hayward, T. (2021). “Conspiracy theory”: The case for being critically receptive. Journal of Social Philosophy, 00, 1– 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12432
  • Herington, Jonathan, and Scott Tanona. “The Social Risks of Science.” Hastings Center Report 50.6 (2020): 27-38.
  • Henning, Tempest M. “Racial Methodological Microaggressions: When good Intersectionality goes bad.” Microaggressions and Philosophy. Routledge, 2020. 251-271.
  • Kaplan, Alexandra D., et al. “Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings.” Human Factors (2021): 00187208211013988.
  • Katovich, Michael A. “Dominance, deference, and demeanor in mad men: Toward a convergence of radical interactionism and radical dramaturgy.” Radical Interactionism on the Rise. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013.
  • Keshavarz, Mahmoud, and Ramia Maze. “Design and dissensus: framing and staging participation in design research.” Design Philosophy Papers 11.1 (2013): 7-29.
  • Koopman, Colin. “The Political Theory of Data: Institutions, Algorithms, & Formats in Racial Redlining.” Political Theory (2021): 00905917211027835.
  • Kreiss, Daniel, Joshua O. Barker, and Shannon Zenner. “Trump gave them hope: Studying the strangers in their own land.” Political Communication 34.3 (2017): 470-478.
  • Kreiss, Daniel. “From Epistemic to Identity Crisis: Perspectives on the 2016 US Presidential Election.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24.3 (2019): 383-388.
  • Kushner, Scott. “The instrumentalised user: human, computer, system.” Internet Histories 5.2 (2021): 154-170.
  • Lee, Caroline W. “Who Is Community Engagement For?: The Endless Loop of Democratic Transparency.” American Behavioral Scientist 64.11 (2020): 1565-1587.
  • Lee, Min Kyung, and Katherine Rich. “Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural Mistrust.” Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.
  • Leighton, Mary, and Elizabeth F. Roberts. “Trust/distrust in Multi-disciplinary Collaboration.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6.2 (2020).
  • Liboiron, Max, Manuel Tironi, and Nerea Calvillo. “Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world.” Social studies of science 48.3 (2018): 331-349.
  • Liveriero, Federica. “Epistemic Injustice in the Political Domain: Powerless Citizens and Institutional Reform.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (2020): 797-813.
  • Lockey, Steven, et al. “A Review of Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Future Directions.” Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2021.
  • Logue, Jennifer. “The politics of unknowing and the virtues of ignorance: Toward a pedagogy of epistemic vulnerability.” Philosophy of Education Archive (2013): 53-62.
  • Luchies, Timothy. “Towards an insurrectionary power/knowledge: Movement-relevance, anti-oppression, prefiguration.” Social Movement Studies 14.5 (2015): 523-538.
  • Maddison, Sarah. “Relational transformation and agonistic dialogue in divided societies.” Political Studies 63.5 (2015): 1014-1030.
  • Maitra, Keya. “Testimonial Injustice and a Case for Mindful Epistemology.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 58.1 (2020): 137-160.
  • Malatino, Hil. “Future Fatigue: Trans Intimacies and Trans Presents (or How to Survive the Interregnum).” Transgender Studies Quarterly 6.4 (2019): 635-658.
  • Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Everyday talk in the deliberative system”. In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
  • Meltzer, Bernard N., and Gil Richard Musolf. “Resentment and ressentiment.” Sociological Inquiry 72.2 (2002): 240-255.
  • Meyers, Diana Tietjens. “Moral reflection: Beyond impartial reason.” Hypatia 8.3 (1993): 21-47.
  • Musolf, Gil R. “Domination and resistance: The political theory of John Dewey.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 41 (2013): 83-121.
  • Origgi, Gloria. “Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust.” Social Epistemology 26.2 (2012): 221-235.
  • Pelkmans, Mathijs, and Rhys Machold. “Conspiracy theories and their truth trajectories.” Focaal 2011.59 (2011): 66-80.
  • Pigg, Stacy Leigh. “On sitting and doing: Ethnography as action in global health.” Social Science & Medicine 99 (2013): 127-134.
  • Porter, Theodore M. “On the virtues and disadvantage of quantification for democratic life.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32.4 (2001): 739-747.
  • Puntoni, Stefano, et al. “Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective.” Journal of Marketing 85.1 (2021): 131-151.
  • Pyne, Jake. ““Building a Person”: Legal and Clinical Personhood for Autistic and Trans Children in Ontario.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 35.2 (2020): 341-365.
  • Rahman, Hatim A. “The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations.” Administrative Science Quarterly (2021): 00018392211010118.
  • Rolin, Kristina. “Scientific community: A moral dimension.” Social Epistemology 31.5 (2017): 468-483.
  • Roskamm, Nikolai. “On the other side of “agonism”:“The enemy,” the “outside,” and the role of antagonism.” Planning Theory 14.4 (2015): 384-403.
  • Saifer, Adam, and M. Tina Dacin. “Data and Organization Studies: Aesthetics, emotions, discourse and our everyday encounters with data.” Organization Studies (2021): 01708406211006250.
  • Schaap, Andrew. “Do you not see the reason for yourself? Political withdrawal and the experience of epistemic friction.” Political Studies 68.3 (2020): 565-581.
  • Semel, Beth M. “Listening Like a Computer: Attentional Tensions and Mechanized Care in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2021): 01622439211026371.
  • Sengers, Phoebe. “Practices for a machine culture: A case study of integrating cultural theory and artificial intelligence.” Surfaces 8 (1999).
  • Seyfert, Robert. “Algorithms as regulatory objects.” Information, Communication & Society (2021): 1-17.
  • Shew, Ashley. “From a figment of your imagination: Disabled marginal cases and underthought experiments.” Human Affairs 30.4 (2020): 608-616.
  • Susen, Simon. “Mysteries, Conspiracies, and Inquiries: Reflections on the Power of Superstition, Suspicion, and Scrutiny.” SocietàMutamentoPolitica 12.23 (2021): 25-62.
  • Thylstrup, Nanna Bonde. “Data out of place: Toxic traces and the politics of recycling.” Big Data & Society 6.2 (2019): 2053951719875479.
  • Watkins, Elizabeth Anne. “The Tension Between Information Justice and Security: Perceptions of Facial Recognition Targeting.” (2020).
  • Yamamoto, Arata D. “The enemy within: The dangers of Chantal Mouffe’s figure of the adversary to the democratic task of agonistic planning.” Planning Theory 17.4 (2018): 551-567.
  • Ylä-Anttila, Tuukka. “Populist knowledge:‘Post-truth’repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5.4 (2018): 356-388.
  • Zimmermann, Benedicte. “From critical theory to critical pragmatism: Capability and the assessment of freedom.” Critical Sociology 44.6 (2018): 937-952.
  • Zureik, Elia, and Karen Hindle. “Governance, security and technology: The case of biometrics.” Studies in Political Economy 73.1 (2004): 113-137.