Stuff I've been reading (June 2021)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in June 2021:

Books

  • de La Bellacasa, Maria Puig. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Vol. 41. U of Minnesota Press, 2017.
  • Berlant, Lauren. Cruel optimism. Duke University Press, 2011.
  • Braithwaite, Valerie, and Margaret Levi, eds. Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.
  • Brown, Wendy. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press, 2020.
  • Chiang, Howard. Transtopia in the Sinophone Pacific. Columbia University Press, 2020.
  • Connolly, William E. The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Duke University Press, 2013.
  • Jaton, Florian. The Constitution of Algorithms: Ground-Truthing, Programming, Formulating. MIT Press, 2021.
  • McCarthy, John, and Peter Wright. Taking [a] part: the politics and aesthetics of participation in experience-centered design. MIT Press, 2015.
  • Strauss, Anselm L. Mirrors & masks: the search for identity. Routledge, 2017.
  • White, Stephen K. Sustaining affirmation: The strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton University Press, 2000.

Papers and Chapters

  • Almassi, Ben. “Climate change, epistemic trust, and expert trustworthiness.” Ethics & the Environment 17.2 (2012): 29-49.
  • Atuk, Tankut. “Hungry Ethics: from doing research to becoming-sangtin.” Gender, Place & Culture (2021): 1-13.
  • Belli, Simone, and Fernando Broncano. “Trust as a meta‐emotion.” Metaphilosophy 48.4 (2017): 430-448.
  • Brunk, Conrad G. “Public knowledge, public trust: understanding the ‘knowledge deficit’.” Public Health Genomics 9.3 (2006): 178-183.
  • Daukas, Nancy. “Epistemic trust and social location.” (Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology) 3.1 (2006): 109-124.
  • D’Cruz, Jason. “Trust and Distrust.” The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy (2020).
  • Dreessen, Katrien, Liesbeth Huybrechts, and Jessica Schoffelen. “Generativity Revisited. Participatory Design for Self-Organization in Communities.” The Design Journal 24.3 (2021): 449-470.
  • Engdahl, Emma, and Rolf Lidskog. “Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust.” Public understanding of science 23.6 (2014): 703-717.
  • Ess, Charles M. “Trust and Information and Communication Technologies.” The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy (2020).
  • Fassin, Didier. “On resentment and ressentiment: the politics and ethics of moral emotions.” Current Anthropology 54.3 (2013): 249-267.
  • Flores, Fernando, and Robert C. Solomon. “Creating trust.” Business Ethics Quarterly (1998): 205-232.
  • Friesen, Phoebe, et al. “Governing AI‐Driven Health Research: Are IRBs Up to the Task?.” Ethics & Human Research 43.2 (2021): 35-42.
  • Furman, Katherine. “Emotions and Distrust in Science.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28.5 (2020): 713-730.
  • Gallegos, Francisco. “Affective injustice and fundamental affective goods. Journal of Social Philosophy. (2021): 1-17.
  • Germann, Pascal. “Race in post-war science: The Swiss case in a global context.” History of the Human Sciences (2021): 09526951211010385.
  • Gillath, Omri, et al. “Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence.” Computers in Human Behavior 115 (2021): 106607.
  • Gilson, Erinn. “Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression.” Hypatia 26.2 (2011): 308-332.
  • Goldenberg, Maya J. “Public misunderstanding of science? Reframing the problem of vaccine hesitancy.” Perspectives on Science 24.5 (2016): 552-581.
  • Govier, Trudy. “Distrust as a practical problem.” Journal of Social Philosophy 23.1 (1992): 52-63.
  • Harding, Mike, et al. “HCI, civic engagement & trust.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015.
  • Hawley, Katherine. “Trustworthy groups and organizations.” The philosophy of trust (2017): 230-250.
  • Holmes, Mary. “Feeling beyond rules: Politicizing the sociology of emotion and anger in feminist politics.” European Journal of Social Theory 7.2 (2004): 209-227.
  • Holton, Richard. “Deciding to trust, coming to believe.” Australasian journal of philosophy 72.1 (1994): 63-76.
  • Jacovi, Alon, et al. “Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in ai.” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2021.
  • Johnson, Casey Rebecca. “Epistemic Vulnerability.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28.5 (2020): 677-691.
  • Johnson, Jessica. “The self-radicalization of white men:“Fake news” and the affective networking of paranoia.” Communication Culture & Critique 11.1 (2018): 100-115.
  • Kay, Jilly Boyce, and Sarah Banet-Weiser. “Feminist anger and feminist respair.” Feminist Media Studies 19.4 (2019): 603-609.
  • Khodyakov, Dmitry. “Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach.” Sociology 41.1 (2007): 115-132.
  • Knowles, Bran, and John T. Richards. “The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI.” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2021.
  • Lahno, Bernd. “Trust and Emotion.” In The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy (2020).
  • Latour, Bruno. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical inquiry 30.2 (2004): 225-248.
  • Law, John. “From After Method to Care-ful Research.”. In Intimate Accounts of Researching Education Policy.
  • Lee, Min Kyung. “Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management.” Big Data & Society 5.1 (2018): 2053951718756684.
  • Lee, Min Kyung, and Katherine Rich. “Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural Mistrust.” Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.
  • McGeer, Victoria. “Trust, hope and empowerment.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86.2 (2008): 237-254.
  • Miceli, Milagros, Martin Schuessler, and Tianling Yang. “Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Vision.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4.CSCW2 (2020): 1-25.
  • Mihai, Mihaela. “Epistemic marginalisation and the seductive power of art.” Contemporary Political Theory 17.4 (2018): 395-416.
  • Nagar, Richa. “Storytelling and co-authorship in feminist alliance work: reflections from a journey.” Gender, Place & Culture 20.1 (2013): 1-18.
  • Nayak, Ajit, and Robert Chia. “Thinking becoming and emergence: process philosophy and organization studies.” Philosophy and organization theory. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011.
  • Nickel, Philip J. “The ethics of uncertainty for data subjects.” The Ethics of Medical Data Donation (2019): 55-74.
  • Petherbridge, Danielle. “What’s Critical about Vulnerability? Rethinking Interdependence, Recognition, and Power.” Hypatia 31.3 (2016): 589-604.
  • Petherbridge, Danielle. “Recognition, Vulnerability and Trust.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29.1 (2021): 1-23.
  • Pettit, Philip. “Trust, reliance and the internet.” Analyse & Kritik 26.1 (2004): 108-121.
  • Pratt, Geraldine. “Collaboration as feminist strategy.” Gender, Place & Culture 17.1 (2010): 43-48.
  • Rolin, Kristina. “Trust in science.” The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy. Routledge, 2020. 354-366.
  • Savolainen, Kaisa, and Sampsa Hyysalo. “User Representations as a Design Resource.” Science & Technology Studies 34.2 (2021): 25-45.
  • Scheman, Naomi. “Trust and Trustworthiness.” The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy (2020).
  • Schoenebeck, Sarita, et al. “Youth Trust in Social Media Companies and Expectations of Justice: Accountability and Repair after Online Harassment.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5.CSCW1 (2021): 1-18.
  • Sullivan, Emily, et al. “Vulnerability in social epistemic networks.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28.5 (2020): 731-753.
  • Tam, Agnes. “A Case for Political Epistemic Trust.” Social Trust. Routledge, 2021. 220-245.
  • Thornton, Lauren, Bran Knowles, and Gordon Blair. “Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design.” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2021.
  • Till, Jeremy. “The negotiation of hope.” Architecture and participation (2005): 23-41.
  • Tschaepe, Mark. “Pragmatic Ethics for Generative Adversarial Networks: Coupling, Cyborgs, and Machine Learning.” Contemporary Pragmatism 18.1 (2021): 95-111.