Stuff I've been reading (March 2020)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in March 2020:

Books

  • Chiang, Howard. After Eunuchs: Science, Medicine, and the Transformation of Sex in Modern China. Columbia University Press, 2018.
  • Cook, Deborah. Adorno, Foucault and the Critique of the West. Verso Trade, 2018.
  • Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. Verso Books, 2007.
  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, 2000.
  • Gordon, Avery F. Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
  • Gupta, Kristina. Medical Entanglements: Rethinking Feminist Debates about Healthcare. Rutgers University Press, 2019.
  • Gutting, Gary. Michel Foucault’s archaeology of scientific reason: Science and the history of reason. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • Hacking, Ian. Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press, 2004.
  • Karkazis, Katrina. Fixing sex: Intersex, medical authority, and lived experience. Duke University Press, 2008.
  • Kincaid, Harold, and Jacqueline A. Sullivan, eds. Classifying psychopathology: Mental kinds and natural kinds. MIT Press, 2014.
  • Lyon, David. The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
  • Mills, C. Wright. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Nash, Jennifer C. Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Duke University Press, 2018.
  • Pateman, Carole, and Charles W Mills. Contract and domination. Polity, 2007.
  • Pearce, Ruth. Understanding trans health: Discourse, power and possibility. Policy Press, 2018.
  • Pearce, Ruth, et al. The emergence of trans: cultures, politics and everyday lives. Routledge, 2019.
  • Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. The brain’s body: Neuroscience and corporeal politics. Duke University Press, 2016.
  • Richardson, Sarah S. Sex itself: The search for male and female in the human genome. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
  • Rubin, David A. Intersex matters: Biomedical embodiment, gender regulation, and transnational activism. SUNY Press, 2017.
  • Scott, Susie. Negotiating identity: Symbolic interactionist approaches to social identity. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  • Simplican, Stacy Clifford. The capacity contract: Intellectual disability and the question of citizenship. University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
  • Singh, Jennifer S. Multiple autisms: Spectrums of advocacy and genomic science. University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
  • Terry, Jennifer. An American obsession: Science, medicine, and homosexuality in modern society. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
  • Tremain, Shelley. Foucault and feminist philosophy of disability. University of Michigan Press, 2017.
  • Zuberi, Tukufu, and Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, eds. White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008.

Papers and Chapters

  • Abend, Gabriel. “The meaning of ‘theory’.” Sociological Theory 26.2 (2008): 173-199.
  • Abend, Gabriel. “Thick Concepts and Sociological Research.” Sociological Theory 37.3 (2019): 209-233.
  • Asad, Talal. “Ethnographic representation, statistics and modern power.” Social Research (1994): 55-88.
  • Bauer, Greta R., et al. “Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations.” PloS one 12.5 (2017).
  • Campolo, Alexander, and Kate Crawford. “Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (2020): 1-19.
  • Carlin, Elizabeth, and Brandon Kramer. “Hair, Hormones, and Haunting: Race as a Ghost Variable in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.” Science, Technology, & Human Values (2020): 0162243920908647.
  • Christman, John. “Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 117.1/2 (2004): 143-164.
  • Delvenne, Pierre, and Hadrien Macq. “Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments.” Science as Culture (2019): 1-24.
  • Dews, Peter. “Adorno, post-structuralism and the critique of identity.” New Left Review 157.1 (1986): 28-44.
  • Dimitriadis, Yorgos. “History of the opposition between psychogenesis and organogenesis in classic psychiatry: Part 1.” History of Psychiatry (2020): 0957154X20904036.
  • Dwyer, Robyn, and Suzanne Fraser. “Making addictions in standardised screening and diagnostic tools.” Health Sociology Review 25.3 (2016): 223-239.
  • Enoch, David. “The disorder of public reason.” Ethics 124.1 (2013): 141-176.
  • Fein, Elizabeth. “Our circuits, ourselves: What the autism spectrum can tell us about the Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC) and the neurogenetic transformation of diagnosis.” BioSocieties 11.2 (2016): 175-198.
  • Finlayson, Lorna. “The Third Shift: the politics of representation and the psychological turn.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43.4 (2018): 775-795.
  • Gelman, Andrew, Greggor Mattson, and Daniel Simpson. “Gaydar and the Fallacy of Decontextualized Measurement.” Sociological Science (2018).
  • Goldenfein, Jake. “The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism.” Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2019.
  • Grasswick, Heidi E. “Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing.” Synthese 177.3 (2010): 387-409.
  • Grasswick, Heidi. “Understanding Epistemic Trust Injustices and Their Harms.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 84 (2018): 69-91.
  • Hacking, Ian. “‘Style’for historians and philosophers.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23.1 (1992): 1-20.
  • Hauswald, Rico. “The ontology of interactive kinds.” Journal of Social Ontology 2.2 (2016): 203-221.
  • Hendriks, Friederike, Dorothe Kienhues, and Rainer Bromme. “Trust in science and the science of trust.” Trust and communication in a digitized world. Springer, Cham, 2016. 143-159.
  • Hendrix, Burke A. “Where should we expect social change in non-ideal theory?.” Political Theory 41.1 (2013): 116-143.
  • Herzog, Lisa. “Ideal and Non‐ideal Theory and the Problem of Knowledge.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 29.4 (2012): 271-288.
  • Holmberg, Christine, Christine Bischof, and Susanne Bauer. “Making predictions: Computing populations.” Science, technology, & human values 38.3 (2013): 398-420.
  • Jensen, Mark. “The limits of practical possibility.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17.2 (2009): 168-184.
  • Kannabiran, Gopinaath, and Marianne Graves Petersen. “Politics at the interface: A Foucauldian power analysis.” Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. 2010.
  • Kittay, Eva. “Deadly medicine: project T4, mental disability, and racism.” Res Philosophica 93.4 (2016): 715-741.
  • Larmore, Charles. “What is political philosophy?.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 10.3 (2013): 276-306.
  • Lee, Heejin, and Steve Sawyer. “Conceptualizing time, space and computing for work and organizing.” Time & Society 19.3 (2010): 293-317.
  • Lloyd, Genevieve. “Individuals, responsibility and the philosophical imagination.” in Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self (2000).
  • Luyt, Russell. “Beyond traditional understanding of gender measurement: The gender (re) presentation approach.” Journal of Gender Studies 24.2 (2015): 207-226.
  • McCall, Leslie. “The complexity of intersectionality.” Intersectionality and beyond. Routledge-Cavendish, 2008. 65-92.
  • Mills, Charles W. “The chronopolitics of racial time.” Time & Society (2020): 0961463X20903650.
  • Nash, Jennifer C. “Re-thinking intersectionality.” Feminist review 89.1 (2008): 1-15.
  • Øvrelid, Egil, Bendik Bygstad, and Ole Hanseth. “Discursive formations and shifting strategies in e-health programmes.” European Conference on Information Systems (2017): 873.
  • Øvrelid, Egil, and Bendik Bygstad. “The role of discourse in transforming digital infrastructures.” Journal of Information Technology 34.3 (2019): 221-242.
  • Pearce, Ruth. “A Methodology for the Marginalised: Surviving Oppression and Traumatic Fieldwork in the Neoliberal Academy.” Sociology (2020): 0038038520904918.
  • Pickersgill, Martyn. “Ordering disorder: Knowledge production and uncertainty in neuroscience research.” Science as Culture 20.1 (2011): 71-87.
  • Primo, David, Adriano Zamperini, and Ines Testoni. “A struggle for definition: online narratives of Italian trans women.” Journal of Gender Studies (2020): 1-14.
  • Rämö, Hans. “An Aristotelian human time-space manifold: From chronochora to kairotopos.” Time & Society 8.2-3 (1999): 309-328.
  • Rämö, Hans. “Doing things right and doing the right things Time and timing in projects.” International Journal of Project Management 20.7 (2002): 569-574.
  • Raun, Tobias. “Trans as Contested Intelligibility.” lambda nordica 19.1 (2014): 13-37.
  • Reeves, Carol. “Owning a virus: The rhetoric of scientific discovery accounts.” Rhetoric Review 10.2 (1992): 321-336.
  • Reindal, Solveig Magnus. “Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy.” Disability & Society 14.3 (1999): 353-367.
  • Shew, Ashley. “Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 40-85, March 2020.
  • Sumerau, J. E., et al. “Helping quantitative sociology come out of the closet.” Sexualities 20.5-6 (2017): 644-656.
  • Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Michiel Van Oudheusden. “Participation beyond consensus? Technology assessments, consensus conferences and democratic modulation.” Social Epistemology 31.6 (2017): 497-513.
  • Whyte, Kyle Powys, and Robert P. Crease. “Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science.” Synthese 177.3 (2010): 411-425.
  • Wilholt, Torsten. “Epistemic trust in science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64.2 (2013): 233-253.