Stuff I've been reading (September 2022)

By Os Keyes

Things I finished reading in September 2022:

Books and dissertations

  • Atkins, Kim. Narrative identity and moral identity: A practical perspective. Routledge, 2008.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt, and Leonidas Donskis. Moral blindness: The loss of sensitivity in liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • Becker, Howard S. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press, 2018.
  • Coeckelbergh, Mark. Human being@ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations. Dordrecht: springer, 2013.
  • DiCaglio, Joshua. Scale Theory: A Nondisciplinary Inquiry. University of Minnesota Press, 2021.
  • Fee, Elizabeth and Daniel M. Fox (eds). AIDS: the making of a chronic disease. University of California Press, 1992.
  • Hartman, Andrew. A war for the soul of America: A history of the culture wars. University of Chicago Press, 2019.
  • Hartsock, Nancy CM. Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Northeastern University Press, 1985.
  • Hepp, A., Jarke, J., & Kramp, L. New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
  • Law, John. Organising modernity: Social ordering and social theory. John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
  • Law, John. Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Duke University Press, 2002.
  • Matar, Anat. The Poverty of Ethics. Verso Books, 2022.
  • Pomeroy, Wardell Baxter. Dr. Kinsey and the institute for sex research. Yale University Press, 1982.
  • Rock, Paul. The Making of symbolic interactionism. Bowman & Littlefield, 1979.
  • Reger, Jo, Daniel J. Myers, and Rachel L. Einwohner, eds. Identity work in social movements. Vol. 30. University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
  • Ward, Jane. The tragedy of heterosexuality. Vol. 56. NYU Press, 2022.
  • Wise, Matthew Norton. Science without laws: model systems, cases, exemplary narratives. Duke University Press, 2007.
  • Zerubavel, Eviatar. The elephant in the room: Silence and denial in everyday life. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Papers and Chapters

  • Barry-Hinton, Sophia Persephone. “Transgender Athlete Bans and the Anatomy of Anti-Transgender Politics.” Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy 12 (2022): 447.
  • Bell, Karen, and Mark Reed. “The tree of participation: a new model for inclusive decision-making.” Community Development Journal (2021).
  • Bjorling, Elin and Laurel D. Riek. “Designing for Exit: How to Let Robots Go”. WeRobot (2022).
  • Burgess, Michael M. “From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy.” Public understanding of science 23.1 (2014): 48-52.
  • Callon, Michel and Law, John. “On the construction of sociotechnical networks.” In Knowledge and society (1989): 57-83.
  • Cinnamon, Jonathan. “Attack the data: Agency, power, and technopolitics in South African data activism.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110.3 (2020): 623-639.
  • Cinnamon, Jonathan. “Power in numbers/Power and numbers: Gentle data activism as strategic collaboration.” Area (2020).
  • Currie, Morgan E., Britt S. Paris, and Joan M. Donovan. “What difference do data make? Data management and social change.” Online Information Review (2018).
  • Della Porta, Donatella, and Rossana Tufaro. “Mobilizing the Past in Revolutionary Times: Memory, Counter‐Memory, and Nostalgia During the Lebanese Uprising.” Sociological Forum. 2022.
  • Escarce, José J., et al. “Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States.” Medical care (1995): 256-271.
  • Esteves, Ana Margarida. “All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace’? Information technology, in-person relationships and normative regulation in an ‘integral cooperative.” Community Development Journal (2021).
  • Gani, Faiz, Daniel E. Ford, and Timothy M. Pawlik. “Potential barriers to the diffusion of surgical innovation.” JAMA surgery 151.5 (2016): 403-404.
  • Hansbury, Griffin, and Avgi Saketopoulou. “Sissy dance $1: The more and more of gender.” The Psychoanalytic Review 109.3 (2022): 227-256.
  • Harris, Adrienne. “Transgender and analytic countertransference.” The Psychoanalytic Review 109.3 (2022): 277-286.
  • Hong, Kari E. “Categorical exclusions: Exploring legal responses to health care discrimination against transsexuals.” Columbia Journal of Gender & Law. 11 (2002): 8
  • Kennedy, Helen. “Living with data: Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication.” Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 2018.1 (2018): 18-30.
  • Kidd, Ian James. “Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55 (2016): 12-19.
  • Langstrup, Henriette, and Tiago Moreira. “Infrastructuring experience: what matters in patient-reported outcome data measurement?.” BioSocieties (2021): 1-22.
  • Lehtiniemi, Tuukka, and Minna Ruckenstein. “The social imaginaries of data activism.” Big Data & Society 6.1 (2018): 2053951718821146.
  • Lockhart, Jeffrey W. “The Gay Right: A Framework for Understanding Right Wing LGBT Organizations.” Journal of Homosexuality (2022): 1-27.
  • Malatino, Hil. “The Promise of Repair: Trans Rage and the Limits of Feminist Coalition.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 46.4 (2021): 827-851.
  • Mason, Katherine. ““Won’t Someone Think of the Children?”: Reproductive Futurism and Same-Sex Marriage in US Courts, 2003-2015.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 15.1 (2018): 83-98.
  • McCammon, Holly J., and Cathryn Beeson-Lynch. “Fighting Words: Pro-Choice Cause Lawyering, Legal-Framing Innovations, and Hostile Political-Legal Contexts.” Law & Social Inquiry 46.3 (2021): 599-634.
  • Michalec, Barret, and Frederic W. Hafferty. “Challenging the clinically-situated emotion-deficient version of empathy within medicine and medical education research.” Social Theory & Health (2021): 1-19.
  • Miller, David C., et al. “Diffusion of surgical innovation among patients with kidney cancer.” Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 112.8 (2008): 1708-1717.
  • Milioni, Dimitra L., and Venetia Papa. “The oppositional affordances of data activism.” Media International Australia (2022): 1329878X221074795.
  • Moyer, Laura P., Alyson Hendricks-Benton, and Megan Balcom. “Opposition to Abortion, Then and Now.” Open Judicial Politics (2021).
  • Pearce, Ruth, and Kirsty Lohman. “Old problems, new forms.” Community Development Journal (2022).
  • Plemons, Eric. “A capable surgeon and a willing electrologist: Challenges to the expansion of transgender surgical care in the United States.” Medical anthropology quarterly 33.2 (2019): 282-301.
  • Reed, Mark S., Rosalind Bryce, and Ruth Machen. “Pathways to policy impact: a new approach for planning and evidencing research impact.” Evidence & Policy 14.03 (2018): 431-458.
  • Reed, Mark S., et al. “A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?.” Restoration ecology 26 (2018): S7-S17.
  • Schwab, Abraham. “Epistemic humility and medical practice: Translating epistemic categories into ethical obligations.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37.1 (2012): 28-48.
  • Simis, Molly J., et al. “The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?.” Public understanding of science 25.4 (2016): 400-414.
  • Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. “Why should we promote public engagement with science?.” Public understanding of science 23.1 (2014): 4-15.
  • Suchman, Lucy, Randall Trigg, and Jeanette Blomberg. “Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype.” The British journal of sociology 53.2 (2002): 163-179.
  • de Vries, Jasper R., et al. “Faking and forcing trust: the performance of trust and distrust in public policy.” Land use policy 38 (2014): 282-289.
  • Ward, Jane. “Gender labor: Transmen, femmes, and collective work of transgression.” Sexualities 13.2 (2010): 236-254.
  • Westbrook, Laurel, Jamie Budnick, and Aliya Saperstein. “Dangerous data: Seeing social surveys through the sexuality prism.” Sexualities (2021): 1363460720986927.