Things I finished reading in May 2021:
Books
- Alcoff, Linda Martín. Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford University Press, 2005.
- Califia, Pat. Sex Changes: The politics of transgenderism.. Cleis, 1997.
- Code, Lorraine. Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford University Press, 2006.
- Connolly, William E. Politics and ambiguity. University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
- Connolly, William E. A world of becoming. Duke University Press, 2011.
- Le Dantec, Christopher A. Designing publics. MIT Press, 2016.
- False-Borda, Orlando and Muhammad Anisur Rahman Action and knowledge. Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. 1991).
- Heath, Rachel Ann. The Praeger handbook of transsexuality: Changing gender to match mindset. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006.
- Honig, Bonnie. A Feminist Theory of Refusal. Harvard University Press, 2021.
- Illich, Ivan. Tools for Conviviality. Marion Boyars, 2001.
- Lugones, María. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.
- Sandoval, Chela. Methodology of the Oppressed. Vol. 18. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
- Vogler, Stefan. Sorting Sexualities: Expertise and the Politics of Legal Classification. University of Chicago Press, 2021.
Papers and Chapters
- Adams, Mary Louise. “There’s no place like home: On the place of identity in feminist politics.” Feminist Review 31.1 (1989): 22-33.
- Berk, Gerald, and Dennis Galvan. “How people experience and change institutions: a field guide to creative syncretism.” Theory and society 38.6 (2009): 543-580.
- Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. “Participatory design and” democratizing innovation”.” Proceedings of the 11th Biennial participatory design conference. 2010.
- Bjögvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. “Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges.” Design issues 28.3 (2012): 101-116.
- Bridges, Lauren E. “Digital failure: Unbecoming the “good” data subject through entropic, fugitive, and queer data.” Big Data & Society 8.1 (2021): 2053951720977882.
- Britzman, Deborah. “Is there a queer pedagogy? Or, stop reading straight.” Curriculum: Toward new identities (1998): 211-232.
- Callon, Michel. “The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design.” Journal of the center for information studies 5.3 (2004): 3-10.
- Caselles, Eric Llaveria. “Dismantling the Transgender Brain.” Graduate Journal of Social Science 14.2 (2018): 135-159.
- Cifor, Marika. “Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse.” Archival Science 16.1 (2016): 7-31.
- Clarke, Adele E. “Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn.” Symbolic interaction 26.4 (2003): 553-576.
- Cohen, Cathy J. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” Black queer studies. Duke University Press, 2005. 21-51.
- Collins, Patricia Hill. “Social inequality, power, and politics: Intersectionality and American pragmatism in dialogue.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26.2 (2012): 442-457.
- Cull, Matthew J. “Engineering is not a luxury: Black feminists and logical positivists on conceptual engineering.” Inquiry 64.1-2 (2021): 227-248.
- Dormandy, Katherine. “Epistemic Self-Trust: It’s Personal.” Episteme (2020): 1-16.
- Epstein, Steven. “Cultivated co-production: Sexual health, human rights, and the revision of the ICD.” Social Studies of Science (2021): 03063127211014283.
- Fischer, Clara. “Consciousness and Conscience: Feminism, Pragmatism, and the Potential for Radical Change.” Studies in Social Justice 4.1 (2010): 67-85.
- Franco-Torres, Manuel, Briony C. Rogers, and Rita M. Ugarelli. “A framework to explain the role of boundary objects in sustainability transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36 (2020): 34-48.
- Hammack, Phillip L., Leifa Mayers, and Eric P. Windell. “Narrative, psychology and the politics of sexual identity in the United States: From ‘sickness’ to ‘species’ to ‘subject’.” Psychology & Sexuality 4.3 (2013): 219-243.
- Häußermann, Johann Jakob, and Christoph Lütge. “Community-in-the-loop: towards pluralistic value creation in AI, or—why AI needs business ethics.” AI and Ethics (2021): 1-22.
- Hayward, Clarissa Rile. “Why does publicity matter? Power, not deliberation.” Journal of Political Power (2021): 1-20.
- Jowett, Adam, and Sophie Barker. “Rhetoric and etiological beliefs about sexuality: Reader responses to Cynthia Nixon’s New York Times interview.” Journal of homosexuality 65.6 (2018): 766-783.
- Jutel, Annemarie. “Uncertainty and the inconvenient facts of diagnosis.” Endeavour 45.1-2 (2021): 100764.
- El Kassar, Nadja. “The Place of Intellectual Self‐Trust in Theories of Epistemic Advantages.” Journal of Social Philosophy 51.1 (2020): 7-26.
- El Kassar, Nadja. “Authenticity and the Significance of Self-Knowledge and Self-Ignorance.” Authenticity. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2020. 29-49.
- Kompridis, Nikolas. “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human?” Parrhesia 8.1 (2009): 20-33.
- Llaveria Caselles, Eric. “Epistemic Injustice in Brain Studies of (Trans) Gender Identity.” Frontiers in sociology 6 (2021): 63.
- Marres, Noortje. “The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy.” Social studies of science 37.5 (2007): 759-780.
- Metcalf, Jacob, and Emanuel Moss. “Owning ethics: Corporate logics, silicon valley, and the institutionalization of ethics.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 86.2 (2019): 449-476.
- Mulligan, Deirdre K., and Helen Nissenbaum. “The Concept of Handoff as a Model for Ethical Analysis and Design.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (2020): 233.
- Perin, Constance. “Operating as experimenting: Synthesizing engineering and scientific values in nuclear power production.” Science, technology, & human values 23.1 (1998): 98-128.
- Petersen, Anette CM, et al. “” We Would Never Write That Down” Classifications of Unemployed and Data Challenges for AI.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5.CSCW1 (2021): 1-26.
- Pierre, Jennifer, et al. “Getting ourselves together: Data-centered participatory design research & epistemic burden.” CHI 2021: The ACM CHI Virtual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2020.
- Pyne, Jake. “Autistic Disruptions, Trans Temporalities: A Narrative “Trap Door” in Time.” South Atlantic Quarterly 120.2 (2021): 343-361.
- Redshaw, Sarah. “Feminist preludes to relational sociology.” In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2013. 13-26.
- Rolin, Kristina. “Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations.” Hypatia 24.4 (2009): 218-226.
- Rupp, Leila J., and Verta Taylor. “Forging feminist identity in an international movement: a collective identity approach to twentieth-century feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24.2 (1999): 363-386.
- Sarewitz, Daniel. “How science makes environmental controversies worse.” Environmental science & policy 7.5 (2004): 385-403.
- Siemiatycki, Matti, Theresa Enright, and Mariana Valverde. “The gendered production of infrastructure.” Progress in Human Geography 44.2 (2020): 297-314.
- Sullivan, Shannon. “Reconfiguring gender with John Dewey: Habit, bodies, and cultural change.” Hypatia 15.1 (2000): 23-42.
- Taylor, Verta. “Gender and social movements: Gender processes in women’s self-help movements.” Gender & Society 13.1 (1999): 8-33.
- Tormos, Fernando. “Intersectional solidarity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5.4 (2017): 707-720.
- Vasilovsky, Alexander T. “Aesthetic as genetic: The epistemological violence of gaydar research.” Theory & Psychology 28.3 (2018):
- Voronov, Maxim, and Russ Vince. “Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work.” Academy of Management review 37.1 (2012): 58-81.
- Wilson, Ara. “The infrastructure of intimacy.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41.2 (2016): 247-280.
- Young, Jason C. “Disinformation as the weaponization of cruel optimism: A critical intervention in misinformation studies.” Emotion, Space and Society 38 (2021): 100757.